On LinkedIn Here

The conversation around generative AI and the future of software development is heating up. Tools like GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and others are already automating significant parts of the coding process, testing, debugging, writing boilerplate, and even suggesting architectural patterns. As a technical manager, it’s easy to wonder: Will we still need teams of developers five years from now?

It’s a valid question, but one that needs unpacking.

Let us be clear: this isn’t an attempt to resist change, deny progress, or romanticise the past. It’s a proactive response grounded in experience, emerging best practices, and the understanding that great software has never been just about the code; it’s about the people behind it.

And those people, your developers, engineers, tech leads, are not going away. In fact, their role is becoming more critical.

1. AI Generates Code. It Doesn’t Own Context.

Generative AI tools can produce clean, usable code based on prompts. But context remains king.

Your team doesn’t just build features; they interpret ambiguous stakeholder requirements, weigh trade-offs between technical debt and delivery speed, and make decisions based on years of accumulated domain knowledge. AI doesn’t yet understand the context of legacy systems, company values, or the nuances of your customer experience. It has no concept of your infrastructure roadmap, compliance requirements, or internal dependencies.

The code may be written by machines, but direction and discernment are human responsibilities. That’s why your development team still matters now, and in the AI-saturated future.

2. Software Doesn’t Sit Still, and Neither Should Your Team

Every technical leader knows shipping code is just the beginning. The real work is in scaling it, supporting it, and evolving it over time.

When systems interact in unpredictable ways when APIs change, regulations shift, or a sudden surge in user growth breaks things, AI tools won’t know how to respond. They can help you triage. But only an experienced human can ask the right questions:

  • Why did this fail in production but pass in test?
  • What’s the long-term cost of this quick fix?
  • How will this scale across markets or geographies?

A resilient software ecosystem requires developers who think in systems and patterns, not just code snippets.

3. Communication, Collaboration, and Cross-Functionality

Let’s talk about meetings, not the ones everyone hates, but the crucial cross-functional discussions that shape real-world products.

Your engineers don’t just write code. They collaborate with product, marketing, compliance, and operations. They mentor juniors, liaise with vendors, and respond to incidents at 2 AM. They explain complexity to non-technical colleagues, and they break ambiguity into executable logic.

AI won’t do stakeholder alignment or pre-mortem planning. It won’t attend your sprint reviews or product discovery workshops. The developers who thrive in this new era will be the ones who can interface as well with people as they do with systems.

4. Responsibility, Ethics, and Risk Still Rest with People

The increasing use of AI in development introduces new vectors of risk. We’re already seeing cases of:

  • AI hallucinating code with subtle but dangerous security vulnerabilities
  • Copy-pasted open-source code with unclear licensing or provenance
  • Bias in ML-powered features, leading to reputational or legal exposure

When that happens, it’s not the model that takes responsibility, it’s the team, the company, and ultimately the leadership.

Governance, review workflows, and architectural sign-off processes will only grow in importance. AI is powerful, but accountability cannot be outsourced.

5. AI Accelerates Output, But Innovation Still Starts with People

The breakthroughs that changed our world relational databases, containerisation, the cloud, continuous delivery didn’t come from recombining old patterns. They came from human creativity and dissatisfaction with the status quo.

Generative AI can remix what’s been done before. But the next paradigm shift? That will still come from a developer asking, “What if we tried this?” or “Why are we still doing it that way?”

In short, AI can help your team go faster. But only your people can decide where to go.

6. Training Your Team to Work With AI, Not Against It

So, what does this mean for technical managers in 2025?

It means reframing hiring and upskilling strategies not away from developers, but toward developers who can collaborate with AI. Those who know how to prompt tools like Copilot effectively, validate the results, and then elevate them with human insight. It means investing in training that blends foundational full-stack skills with AI-era practices, not just traditional bootcamp content.

If you’re onboarding junior developers or upskilling existing staff, there are government-supported programmes that do just that, offering high-quality technical education, real-world projects, and support with placement or progression. Here’s one designed for the future of full-stack software.

Final Thoughts: It’s Not Man vs. Machine, It’s Man with Machine

The future of software development isn’t a binary choice between human coders and AI systems. It’s a partnership. AI is the co-pilot, not the captain.

As a leader, your role is to build teams that are resilient, adaptable, and prepared to evolve, not just with technology, but through it. Hire people who can think, communicate, and care about what they build. Support them with the tools and training they need to thrive in a new era.

The future doesn’t belong to those who write every line of code by hand. It belongs to those who know which lines to trust AI with and which ones to write themselves.

#AIinSoftwareDevelopment #TechLeadership #FutureOfWork #HumanInTheLoop #SoftwareEngineering #AIDrivenDevelopment #DeveloperExperience #TeamGrowth #AIAndDevelopers #SkillsBootcamps #FullStackDevelopment #UpskillingInTech #CodeWithAI #ResponsibleAI #Step8Up